Search for: "United States v. Sealed Search Warrant"
Results 81 - 100
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
First, in support of this argument, Plaintiff cites only a United States Supreme Court case analyzing the privacy language in the Freedom of Information Act's ("FOIA") statutory exemption provisions. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:50 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant before obtaining cell-site-location information from cellphone service providers. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Four years later, the Supreme Court revisited the issue in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
” The Supreme Court generally views searches conducted without a warrant as per se unreasonable. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
The District Court Judge then pointed out that the Government complied with the Court's order by providing a declaration from Robert Patterson, an Assistant Special Agent in Charge at the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (`DEA’), which the Government initially filed ex parte and under seal and later filed publicly in redacted form. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 2:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 4:16 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
United States, 754 F. [read post]
