Search for: "United States v. Sellers" Results 81 - 100 of 1,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2021, 10:33 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/5687/securities-industry-commentator/SEC Suspends Trading in Inactive Issuer Touted on Social Media (SEC Release)Statement of Acting Chair Allison Herren Lee on Contingent Settlement Offers (SEC Release)Amazon seller blasts the company's forced arbitration policy in congressional hearing on antitrust (CNBC by Lauren Feiner and Annie… [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:06 pm
He represented the FDIC as Receiver of United States National Bank in San Diego, California, between 1973 and 1983. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:06 pm
He represented the FDIC as Receiver of United States National Bank in San Diego, California, between 1973 and 1983. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 5:30 pm by Vandenack Weaver LLC
 A recent United States District Court, District of Nevada demonstrates this issue. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, class action funding arrangements are required to be disclosed by Standing Order of all judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:35 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of AlabamaOpinion Date: 9/1/09Cite: Movie Gallery US, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm by lpcprof
A comparative look at real estate law and practice in English Canada, Québec, England, and the United States reveals wide differences in approach, revealing deeper differences in how the jurisdictions treat latent defects. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
  The new case denied Tuesday was United Airlines v. [read post]
Case date: 14 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-3369 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Second, the plaintiffs asserted claims on behalf of over 100 members of a proposed class of consumers throughout the United States, including class members from states other than Delaware or California. [read post]