Search for: "United States v. Serna"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 4:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, No. 15 C 7755, United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:19 pm
In Aranda v Serna, 2013 WL 665064 (M.D.Tenn.) [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:07 pm
Did you know that Georgia has one of the highest pedestrian fatality rates in the entire United States? [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
Here are three more summary orders of interest.In United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:14 pm
” … In Serna v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:38 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:12 pm
Serna v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
So we were pleased when, several years after Rimbert, a federal MDL judge rejected that conclusion and opined that New Mexico did indeed follow the learned intermediary rule along with all but one other United States jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
, 836 F.3d 507, 511 (5th Cir. 2016) (quoting Serna v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
, 836 F.3d 507, 511 (5th Cir. 2016) (quoting Serna v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Feb. 7, 2013); Serna v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
