Search for: "United States v. Shanahan" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
Ed Shanahan reports for the New York Times. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It is therefore a "requirement that pseudonymity be limited to the 'unusual case.'" United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:03 am by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court announced on Monday morning that it would take up two cases arising out of the Trump administration’s effort to stem immigration through the United States’ border with Mexico. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Plain Dealer, 632 N.E.2d 1282, 1284 (Ohio 1994) ("The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 9:33 am by Sarah Grant
Shanahan, in the District of Columbia; Karnoski v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
They have been “playing” the United States for years. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, is a revival, having been to the Court once before. [read post]