Search for: "United States v. Shane" Results 1 - 20 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2022, 2:49 pm by Immigration Prof
Peter Shane in the Washington Monthly does not have much use for the Supreme Court's recent refusal to stay an injunction while an appeal is [pending in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:39 am by Kevin
The example in the headline, United States v. [read post]
On September 18, 2020, we wrote an article discussing how the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Johnson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
”  Siegel focuses on what such an argument might look like in the context of constitutional arguments about liberty and equality in the family, but she also touches on how it might have improved upon the male-centered analysis of federalism in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:16 pm
IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC, IMH Financial Corporation, Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc., IMH Holdings, LLC, IMH Management Services, LLC, Shane Albers, William Meris and Steven Darak (the "IMH Defendants"), before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (the "Wood Action"), as well as an application to enjoin the vote from proceeding. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:16 pm by Brett Alcala
IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC, IMH Financial Corporation, Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc., IMH Holdings, LLC, IMH Management Services, LLC, Shane Albers, William Meris and Steven Darak (the "IMH Defendants"), before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (the "Wood Action"), as well as an application to enjoin the vote from proceeding. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Will Baude
It begins: Last June, the headlines said that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
In anticipation of the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Shane Thomas Young v US No.18-6221, the Tenth Circuit held that lying by law enforcement during an interrogation was acceptable but that lying about having a special relationship with the judge was not. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Overton v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
 Wells was up to Fort Meade, covering this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Shane Taylor, [Maureen’s] witness, testified that he examined [her] computer. . . . [read post]