Search for: "United States v. Sharkey" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 11:34 pm
Sharkey of NYU Law has posted her forthcoming Willamette Law Review article on SSRN: "Federal Incursions and State Defiance: Punitive Damages in the Wake of Philip Morris v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
She also serves as a consultant to the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:22 am by admin
Judge Robert Sweet of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York stated in the case of Sharkey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co v Campbell (2003): The Misguided Legacy of ProportionalityCatherine M Sharkey (New York University, USA)14. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
            Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Adam Zimmerman
Two separate legal systems in the United States regulate safety. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Gregory The Significance of Sprint/United Management Company v. [read post]