Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 281 - 300 of 1,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:25 pm
International and United States law prohibits the discharge of waste containing more than 15 parts per million oil without treatment by an oil water separator and oil sensing equipment. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am by Sophia Cope
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in Glik v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:10 pm by Christiana Wayne
” The United States, United Kingdom and Australia will negotiate the details of the deal during the next 18 months, focusing particularly on safeguards and nonproliferation measures. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 9:41 am
Sharpe, Judge), arguing that the district court erred by (1) concluding that the sentence recommended by the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") accounted for the factors under § 3553(a) and (2) failing to state adequately its reasons for imposing the chosen sentence, as required by § 3553(c). [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:17 am by SHG
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Written by Dr Rishi Gulati, LSE Fellow in Law, London School of Economics; Barrister, Victorian Bar, Australia The regulation of public international organisations (IOs) has been brought into sharp focus following the landmark US Supreme Court ruling in Jam v International Finance Corporation586 US (2019) (Jam). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Helen Klein
Sharpe, The Law of Habeas Corpus 5 (1990). [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]