Search for: "United States v. Shepherd" Results 21 - 40 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 12:46 am
Ever since the US Supreme Court ruled in Morrison et al v National Australia Bank Ltd et al that claimants not residing in the United States or American citizens who purchased shares on a foreign exchange can’t settle or litigate their case in the US, these parties have been seeking other jurisdictions to get their claims resolved. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
Over at The WSJ Law Blog, there's a nice profile of Richard Diaz, the Florida solo who represents Michael Williams, a defendant who is challenging the constitutionality of a federal child-pornography statute in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:48 am
England is trying to catch up with Ohio and the rest of the United States when it comes to Family Law. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:23 am
For instance, the Church adopted its Dennis Canon in response to the United States Supreme Court's endorsement of neutral principles in the case of Jones v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:34 am by John W. Scanlan
Case date: 17 March 2020 Case number: No. 18-3500 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
Judge Shepherd then ends, as he frequently does when a ruling seems unfair -- by blaming the legislature: The passengers’ grievance in this case lies with the United States Congress. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument  in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
The team challenging the law includes Roberta Kaplan, who shepherded the successful challenge top DOMA in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Tully, Getting it Wrong or Being Ignored: Ten Words on Advice for Government LawyersMichael Bowman, Transcending the Fisheries Paradigm: Towards a Rational Approach to Determining the Future of the International Whaling CommissionTrevor Ryan, Sea Shepherd v Greenpeace? [read post]