Search for: "United States v. Shore"
Results 1 - 20
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
His cash outlay was the first month’s lease payment of $7,500 but his generous Uncle Sam at the United States Treasury is allowing him to deduct the entire $289,997 on his 2023 return. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Whereas Warren Court activism was generally in the service of democracy, some of the most egregious Roberts Court decisions--gutting the Voting Rights Act, invalidating bipartisan campaign finance regulation, rendering challenges to partisan gerrymandering impossible, and much more--seem designed to make government in the United States less democratic. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
United States) "the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm
Such was the case in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Sadly, the Supreme Court majority elided those difficulties in Brnovich v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 10:40 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
We have seen a dramatic expansion of enfranchisement in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10 (1972). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Clair Shores General Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
United States (1928), foregrounded a right to privacy, an idea that would only later become a core part of liberalism, with Supreme Court decisions such as Griswold v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Dept. of Commerce – and who have engineered the SEC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
” (Citing Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
