Search for: "United States v. Silberman"
Results 61 - 80
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 am
Circuit, in an opinion by Senior Judge Silberman, reversed, in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
The two other judges, gauging by their questions, expressed at least some agreement with Hentif or a measure of disagreement with the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 11:00 am
But jurisdictional objections are another matter, as the United States explains in its opposition brief: 1. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
United States Dept. of Energy, No. 11-1066 (D.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:12 pm
Related posts: The United States Supreme Court to Take a Fresh Look at Personal Jurisdiction Goodyear and McIntyre: General and Specific Personal Jurisdiction Addressed by the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:52 pm
United States Department of Energy, Quote of the Day [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:52 pm
United States Department of Energy, Quote of the Day [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
Judge Laurence Silberman of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
If you listened to the oral arguments in front the Supreme Court, and you thought that some of the questions being asked by the Justices displayed an inability to comprehend the basic functioning of health insurance in the United States, congratulations. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
Maryland, and NLRB v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Judge Silberman's "regulate"-includes-"require" argument to the contrary in Seven-Sky), Congress does have the Commerce Clause authority to control the means and timing of payment for goods and services that persons will consume, particularly so as to assure that the consumers do in fact pay for the costs of such goods or services. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 14 (2010) (“[The petitioner] argues that the Federal Rules of Evidence and the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:25 pm
In its 1995 decision in United States v. [read post]
