Search for: "United States v. Simon"
Results 361 - 380
of 888
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 1:30 am
The right to life movement draws its name from the founding documents of the United States of America, a nation which boldly asserted the distillation of Western civilization’s hopes and dreams and values. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
As the Solicitor General stressed in his brief, it is issued “in the name of the United States” and is transmitted by the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm
In 2011, Tam sought to register The Slants as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”· Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”· Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India· Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
So while in 2012 ‘intrusion upon seclusion’ may have found favour with Whata J, this could be the fullest extent to which New Zealand courts adopt the United States’ Restatements torts (sourced from Harvard Law Professor William Prosser’s seminal 1960 article). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:21 am
This Kat was so reminded in revisiting the 2013 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Already LLC dba Yums v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm
” by Margaret Simons. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am
I was speaking to a thoughtful, insightful person last night who asked me, “What if Simon Tam wins in Lee v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 2:09 pm
” Parket v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:35 am
Schaffer v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 1:21 pm
The opinion in S.G. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:51 am
Simon Klopschinskirospatt osten pross – Intellectual Property Rechtsanwälte In the international investment arbitration of Eli Lilly v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
I am happy to announce the publication of my article: "A Lex Mercatoria for Corporate Social Responsibility Codes Without the State? [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
United States George W. [read post]
