Search for: "United States v. Simon"
Results 381 - 400
of 888
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm
An Article I wrote in 2001 Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
Simon, 266 P.3d 109 [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
The second group of essays traces the nature and dimensions of Blackstone's impact in various jurisdictions outside England, namely Quebec (Michel Morin), Louisiana and the United States more generally (John W Cairns and Stephen M Sheppard), North Carolina (John V Orth) and Australasia (Wilfrid Prest). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:01 pm
The panel asked about United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
On 27 January 2017, the Court of Appeal (Patten, King and Simon LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of His Highness Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdullah Al Alaoui of Morocco v Elaph Publishing Limited ([2017] EWCA Civ 29) , heard 30 November 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 9:48 am
Circuit opinion in Simon v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
” (This may have been the first sign of Ruth’s future role as one of the most active and precise questioners on the United States Supreme Court Bench.) [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:51 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
United States Melania Trump has attended a hearing in her libel case against a Maryland blogger apparently to show how serious she is about the case. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 10:09 am
I was going to do a post collecting all the briefs filed in the United States Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
United States Rolling Stone magazine has urged judges to overturn the libel verdict against them over fabricated story about University of Virginia rape. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am
But there's a new Copyright Act in the United States, just two years old, and it will allow you to reclaim your copyright from the publishers after 35 years. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
But there's a new Copyright Act in the United States, just two years old, and it will allow you to reclaim your copyright from the publishers after 35 years. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
On 30 November 2016, the Court of Appeal (Patten, King and Simon LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of His Highness Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdullah Al Alaoui of Morocco v Elaph Publish Limited. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 3:04 am
”Sorrell didn’t require a different outcome, nor did Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
