Search for: "United States v. Singleton"
Results 61 - 77
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
Newest Charges Related to Alleged COVID-19 Fraud United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court, October 14, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:52 pm
Beyond that, we have what I described elsewhere as an ‘epidemic of Brady violations abroad in the land,’ a phrase that has brought much controversy but brought about little change in the way prosecutors operate in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
$20,000 each Singleton v Leisureworld Inc. (2008), 166 ACWS (3d) 886, 2008 CarswellOnt 2128 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am
$20,000 each Singleton v Leisureworld Inc. (2008), 166 ACWS (3d) 886, 2008 CarswellOnt 2128 (Ont Sup Ct J). [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
But the Patriot Act amended the SMTJ statute to make clear that it covers overseas bases, at least "with respect to offenses committed by or against a national of the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Singleton, Liability of Owner or Possessor of Land, 21 S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:07 pm
[United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
