Search for: "United States v. Sosa"
Results 81 - 100
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:21 am
United States. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
In retrospect, even Sosa v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
In the seminal ATS case Sosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:17 pm
and that piracy only constituted robbery on the high seas per the 1820 Supreme Court decision United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm
Citing Sosa v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
As a supplement to prior writing on this issue, consider the following, which reflects an analysis of citation data collected from all reported federal judicial opinions that have analyzed CIL since the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Sosa v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm
The young United States did not wish to harbor a pirate or slave trader considered the enemy of all mankind. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:38 am
The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the ATS in Sosa v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
As Justice Souter explained in his opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
Meir attempts to avoid these problems by arguing that the Sosa decision itself interpreted the ATS as limited to conduct for which the United States might be held responsible. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am
Peña-Irala, and the Supreme Court’s 2004 opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm
After a brief surge in litigation, the Supreme Court significantly curtailed the ATS’s effectiveness tremendously in Sosa v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:23 am
” In a July 25, 2018 decision, United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:38 am
“Cualquier persona es vulnerable a ser víctima de robo de identidad. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:30 am
Although the Supreme Court endorsed this view in dicta in Sosa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:01 pm
See Sosa, 542 U.S. at 714-718, 722-724 & n.15. [read post]
