Search for: "United States v. Sosa"
Results 101 - 120
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm
When a company or an employee leads the company’s operations from within the United States and pockets profits from human rights abuses suffered abroad, the courts in the United States must exercise jurisdiction to hold them accountable. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
For each of these the District Court relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Sosa v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
The circumstances for this week's Kiobel hearing therefore seems quite different than the context for the Supreme Court's earlier review of the ATS in Sosa v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:00 pm
Véase, In re State ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
With circuits having gone different directions on this issue, this perhaps tees up a SCOTUS review that would revisit its last, delphic pronouncement on the Alien Tort Statute in Sosa v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second... [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 7:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
Under Sosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:53 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:18 am
In its seminal 2004 opinion in Sosa, the Supreme Court had specifically left open the question of whether the ATS applies to non-state actors, such as corporations. [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:35 pm
This was made clear in his decision in Sosa v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:30 am
Supreme Court (above left) set out in Sosa v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Our third criticism is that the majority’s analysis of whether corporations are ‘subjects’ of international law is in error, for the simple reason that such analysis is irrelevant to the question of whether the United States, through the enactment of a statute, could impose domestic civil liability on corporations for conduct that violates international law. [read post]
