Search for: "United States v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 101,927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
L. 112-40 (2011) applied to PUA benefits, as PUA benefits qualify as an “unemployment compensation program of the United States” for which a minimum 15% administrative concealment penalty must be charged. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:51 am
Garland, 593 U.S. 155, 171–72 (2021); United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
United Healthcare of Ariz., Inc. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
On April 24 and 25, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit unanimously upheld two federal district court decisions rejecting challenges to the federal approvals for the Vineyard Wind offshore wind farm in the cases of Nantucket Residents Against Turbines v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:01 am
Elrod v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:00 pm
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC’s Allegations The FTC alleges that the proposed acquisition would violate the law in several ways: (i) it would result in the elimination of significant head-to-head competition between the handbag brands; (ii) it would significantly increase concentration in an alleged market for “accessible luxury” handbags in the United States; (iii) it would result in significant effects on the wages, benefits and working conditions of employees of the merging parties;… [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:43 am
See Adolph v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
