Search for: "United States v. State of Arizona et al" Results 21 - 40 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
New Hampshire has the highest level of net outbound smuggling at 52.4 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Following the leaked draft of the United States Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
12 May 2022, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
“In the United States, Escherichia coli O157:H7 causes ≈73,000 infections and 60 deaths annually (1). [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]