Search for: "United States v. State of ND"
Results 1 - 20
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
In Chaudhry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
In short, it is now black-letter law in the United States that personal information can only be collected for disclosed and contextually relevant purposes. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
U.S. support and advice to Israel has recently focused on limiting civilian deaths, and yesterday, Israeli government spokesperson Eylon Levy said, “we are going to continue with our campaign to destroy Hamas, a campaign that the United States sees eye to eye with us about. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
As of July 18, 2023, a total of 10 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from four states (CA (2), HI (1), OR (1), WA (6)). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:57 am
See also, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 6:03 pm
” The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Garvield v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
See also United States v Power, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 20-po-331-GLS), 2023 WL 131050, and United States v Robertson, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 22-po-867-GLS), 2023 WL 131051, *12 ("[T]he Court… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
But, as the United States Supreme Court has observed in a different but related context, the "inappropriate or controversial character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
United States (CA5 2013) (federal employee's RFRA claim could proceed even though de minimis standard foreclosed Title VII claim). [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
Romanick, (ND Sup. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
In Carrier v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
Ericsson evidentiary hearing (a trial by any other name) in the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) (Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Monica Bhattacharyya.Here are the minutes of the final trial day in Texas, which was rather short owing to the settlement:Ericsson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
In a new test of abortion rights, four medical organizations and four doctors filed suit last week in a Texas federal district court challenging the FDA's long-standing approval for use in the United States of the chemical abortion drugs mifepristone and misoprostol. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:16 am
Deterring strategic attacks against the United States, allies, and partners. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:53 pm
Southcentral Foundation (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act; Tribal Organization; Employment) United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am
The United States Supreme Court recently elucidated the structure of the required analysis in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc v Bruen (2022). [read post]
