Search for: "United States v. Stitt"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
Stitt, consolidated for argument with United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:14 am
So the preview in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
United States, and then, in two consolidated cases, Stitt and Sims v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am
Additional follow-on litigation to Johnson has involved questions about other aspects of ACCA’s “violent felony” definition, as in next term’s United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 12:58 pm
Stitt & United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Stitt, 17-765); a habeas issue (Sexton v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:36 pm
Issue summaries are from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 11:08 am
Stitt, No. 17-765 and United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:29 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
United States, 17-646, Tyler v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 2:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:21 am
§ 39-14-403) is not a crime of violence under the ACCA.In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:19 am
United States, 15-6060, the right to counsel pre-indictment case, in the morning, and United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit granted en banc review in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 11:20 am
Last February, Judges Merritt, Batchelder, and Rogers announced in Turner v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:53 am
Lynch v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
