Search for: "United States v. Sullivan" Results 321 - 340 of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2016, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, striking down the former Virginia governor’s federal corruption convictions; she argues that the ruling “broadcasts entirely the wrong message to both elected officials and the businessmen, businesswomen and their lobbyists trying to woo them into action. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:39 pm by Viking
The Recordnet.com reports on the non-capital referral decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:35 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:00 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
In 1A AUTO, INC. v Sullivan, the plaintiffs allege, “There is no legitimate justification for allowing unions to contribute thousands of dollars to candidates, parties, and political committees, while completely banning any contributions from businesses. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court will decide whether mandatory statutory gun-sentencing provisions limit a district court’s discretion under the advisory sentencing guidelines. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Thus, there is no requirement that in the state court proceeding the petitioner cite the provisions of the United States Constitution which were violated. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:47 am
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued this show cause order in Adolph v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:31 am
Law Webinars - September 2023 Join Us for Constitution Day 2023 - Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]