Search for: "United States v. Sutton"
Results 161 - 180
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Rule 16.5 concerns defences, and states that a defendant must state which allegations he admits, denies, and is unable to admit or deny and requires the claimant to prove (a non-admission). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Rule 16.5 concerns defences, and states that a defendant must state which allegations he admits, denies, and is unable to admit or deny and requires the claimant to prove (a non-admission). [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly, the Ninth Circuit has held that a private employee cannot not assert a RFRA action against a private employer, in Sutton v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm
United States, 132 S. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:52 am
The en banc court handed down its opinions today, with Judge Sutton writing the majority opinion disagreeing with the panel decision. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm
But that panel's opinion today in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Curtis V. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Sutton, 310 S.C. 200, 422 S.E.2d 750 (1992). [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
Poverty can be grim and corrosive, and social mobility in the United States is not what it used to be. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court wrote that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
As Judge Sutton wrote in concurrence in Mitts: “Sometimes there is nothing wrong with letting the United States Supreme Court decide whether a decision is correct and, if not, whether it is worthy of correction. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:52 pm
In Romeike v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
United States (No. 96-8986), in which the Court appointed now-Judge Jeff Sutton.) [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
Second, the case itself (apart from the issues on appeal) demonstrates the increasing specter of criminal liability in cases of trade secrets theft - particularly when the theft is intended to benefit companies outside the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:36 pm
In 2012, Scioto Insurance Company v. [read post]
