Search for: "United States v. Sweet" Results 61 - 80 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 3:10 pm by Larry
United States involves the tariff classification of prepared tempura vegetables. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by William Melater
The defendant will claim the onus is on the plaintiff, who lives in the United States, filed a claim in the United States and intends to testify, presumably in English or through her own translator, at the eventual trial. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
The United States Supreme Court must be despairing of how many patent appeals are coming its way. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
The United States Supreme Court must be despairing of how many patent appeals are coming its way. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:10 am
  McNeil countered that consumers were not misled by its advertisements.The parties have engaged in various out-of-court disputes as well as this action and the two cases already settled, one in France and one in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:31 am
Maintaining its recent record of coming out ahead of its cover date, the July 2007 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's monthly IP flagship journal, the European Intellectual Property Review, still edited by its originator Hugh Brett, has some highly timely and topical content. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:36 am by Mark Summerfield
  This change from the old ‘fair basis’ provision was intended to align Australian patent law with that of the UK and Europe, requiring the disclosure to be commensurate with the scope of the claims, i.e. that the description should be sufficient to enable the skilled person to perform the invention across the full width of the claims.So far, there has been no judicial consideration of this new enablement requirement, and until recently there was just one Patent Office decision, CSR… [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am by SHG
  Even the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, masters of their domain when it comes to keeping drug dealers convicted and imprisoned, will jump as high as need be to appease the grocery clerk.Consider what happened in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:47 pm by Ad Law Defense
** FDA concludes its study on “Evaporated Cane Juice” – issues guidance that it is a misleading description for mere Sugar… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:11 am by Cleve Clinton
Understandably, the energy industry and lawyers across the state are closely following the real case with very similar facts – Enterprise Products Partners LP v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am by Timothy Edgar
  When it comes to the Russians, the United States won’t get such a sweet deal. [read post]