Search for: "United States v. Tacoma"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
GEO owned and operated the Northwest Detention Center (“NWDC”), a 120,000 square foot private detention facility on the Tacoma tide flats, pursuant to a contract with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (“ICE”). [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
APM Terminals Tacoma, LLC, et al., No. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:16 pm
A recent case out of Washington State decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- Ocampo v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:05 am
In, United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:05 pm
Day Two of Witt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:34 pm
Liberty Tax Loses Preliminary Injunction to Former Liberty Franchisee Regarding Enforcement of Post-Term Restriction Liberty Tax Franchisee Represented by GLF Wins in Post-Term Covenant Case in Federal Court ——————————————————— UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JTH TAX LLP, doing business as Liberty Tax Service , Plaintiff,… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 10:49 am
City of Tacoma Lexington Ins. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:54 am
” As Vice Motherboard first reported, the remarks came from the November 1 hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:33 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:15 am
Cottom, but a DOJ spokesman now says this case, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:32 am
In Etienne v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:42 pm
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972) (same); Black v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/15/08-30360.pdf United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/11/08/08-10167.pdf United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
The court found that although the provisions of United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
The appeals court pointed out that the DOL’s case would depend on the information received from 150 other state employees who had consented to the disclosure of their identities, and that the state employer already had this information in its possession (Perez v United States District Court, Tacoma, April 18, 2014, Trott, S). [read post]
