Search for: "United States v. Tam"
Results 1 - 20
of 978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 9:02 am
I was going to do a post collecting all the briefs filed in the United States Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:00 am
Tam (Matal v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
The court's decision in Miracle on 34th Street: Uh, since the United States government declares this man to be Santa Claus, this court will not dispute it. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
The court's decision in Miracle on 34th Street: Uh, since the United States government declares this man to be Santa Claus, this court will not dispute it. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
Tam tomorrow, January 18, 2016. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:21 am
Court of Appeals decision applying the Supreme Court’s decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
"[Plaintiff] argues it should not have to pay any costs because it was acting in the public interest by bringing the lawsuit as a qui tam relator to help the United States enforce the false marking statute; and if anything, it should only be required to pay half of any allowable costs. [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:29 pm
On May 10, District Judge James Fox of the EDNC granted a homeowners association’s motion to remand to state court its case against a property owner, overruling the man’s objection that as a qui tam relator in a separate case, he was an officer of the United States for purpose of federal court jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:10 pm
The False Claims Act allows an individual (called a “relator”) to bring a civil action (a qui tam action) “for the person and for the United States Government” against persons who have defrauded the government. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:04 pm
In the now-famous/infamous case Pequignot v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Yesterday, Whistleblowers in United States ex. rel.Fowler v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:34 pm
* * * The United States filed its complaint in three consolidated lawsuits pending in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
” Based on the historical pedigree of qui tam statutes in England and the United States, the Supreme Court upheld qui tam informers’ standing in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court’s decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court’s decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
