Search for: "United States v. Tejada"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2009, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:22 am
Gast, 405 F.3d 797, 801-02 (9th Cir.2005), with United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
Tejada wrote: "It must be understood that I am 100% the subject of a United States government mind control experiment project that is on-going. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:53 am
On Friday the First Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:54 am
Here we have a report of United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:52 pm
United States, 347 U.S. 227 (1954) for certain extraneous juror contacts. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:12 am
"United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:31 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:50 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
Tejada, 956 F.2d 1256, 1263 (2d Cir. 1992); United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:59 pm
Tejada and U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am
With the Second World War winding down, von Braun surrendered to the Americans and moved his rocket building team, and talents, to the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:01 am
A search is unconstitutional not in the abstract but only to the extent it impermissibly infringes on the particular defendant's reasonable expectation of privacy (United States v Payner, 447 US 727, 731 [1980] ["the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights are violated only when the challenged conduct invaded his legitimate expectation of privacy rather than that of a third party"] [emphasis in original]). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
