Search for: "United States v. The Commissioner"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2013, 3:35 pm
A state may deny access to records available to its citizens pursuant to its Freedom of Information Law to individuals not citizens of that state who make a FOIL request for such records McBurney Et Al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
Available from: www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Forum/Pages/2012ForumonBusinessandHumanRights.aspx Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (f) See the link of the Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR) to tools on business and human rights, including the publication containing the text of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
So, with all of that background, we return to FEF v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am
In a decision with significant potential ramifications for flows of personal data from the European Union to the United States, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14) that the Safe Harbor Decision no longer provides adequate protection for data transferred between the EU and the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:41 pm
Commissioner, U.S. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:20 am
Manuel Chavez, addressed the applicability of anti-SLAPP to federal law claims, specifically §1983 of title 42 of the United States Code. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
At issue in Christie v. [read post]
Arthrex on Remand: Commissioner of Patents Drew Hirshfeld and the Problem of Shadow Acting Officials
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
(My colleague Rebecca Eisenberg and I have criticized United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm
I have just received a copy of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s first Memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps regarding the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier today in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:38 am
Tammany Parish Government v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
United States (sustaining independent regulatory commissions) and Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:58 am
The Commissioners argued that the case was controlled by Waskovich v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am
Steven Sieff, consultant in the tax team at CMS, offers a preview of the decision awaited in Project Blue Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs After initially being heard by the First-tier Tribunal in 2013 and most recently by the Court of Appeal in 2016, the Project Blue SDLT case finally reached the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on 28 February 2018. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:47 am
The school district should be mindful that the United States Constitution prohibits government action that tends to support or sponsor a particular faith or religious group. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Barr v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 4:00 pm
“The short answer is we are not taking that position [that Americans don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy for their e-mail],” he said, noting that the agency follows the verdict from the United States v. [read post]
