Search for: "United States v. Thomas" Results 241 - 260 of 7,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:42 am by Mark Graber
  Thomas condemns the Supreme Court decision in Buck v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
United States (1944), which upheld the internment of over 100,000 Japanese-Americans during World War II. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
. ---: Brief for Petitioner Thomas Carr ---: Brief for National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner ---: Brief for Law Professors in Support of Petitioner Earlier case which will be tested: CALDER v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:05 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States today issued two decisions in argued cases: The Court today issued decisions in the following two cases -- 1. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:47 am
Jun. 13, 2011) (Thomas, J.), the United States Supreme Court held that purposes of a securities fraud claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm by zshapiro
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 12:05 pm by Kevin Miles
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT  No. 12–398. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:25 am
Thomas, on the issue of unconstitutionally excessive statutory damages, a petition for certiorari has been filed with the United States Supreme Court.The petition maintains that a statutory damages award which is 44 times the actual damages is unconstitutional. [read post]