Search for: "United States v. Timothy Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Mary Nobles Hancock, God Save the United States and this Honorable County Board of Commissioners: Lund, Bormuth, and the Fight Over Legislative Prayer, (76 Wash. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
Most significantly, the Solicitor General of the United States, Elizabeth B. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 5:30 pm
For publication opinions today (5): Timothy Strowmatt v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:42 am
United States Congress: Is there Any Room for God? [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm by Gabriel Chin
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in United States v. [read post]
” The likelihood of such appeal is questionable, however, particularly in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
” The likelihood of such appeal is questionable, however, particularly in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 11:14 am by David Ingram
It would also override the Supreme Court’s 1999 ruling in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]