Search for: "United States v. Treasury Employees"
Results 141 - 160
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
” Fortunately, the Department of Treasury recently proposed regulations that provide guidance regarding how to calculate whether an ICHRA provides “affordable” coverage. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:54 am
Constitutionality On March 1, 2024, the Corporate Transparency Act met a judicial roadblock in National Small Business United v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:25 am
In its complaint in EEOC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
If this is true, I would like to offer $5 per firm for options just like those that high-end IP firms grant to their star employees.(2) As no doubt was expected, the Treasury stuck to its guns in the final regulations. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 2:26 pm
This was a civil case filed by Kenneth Mynett, an IRS employee, against the United States and various federal employees. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:18 am
Richard Katskee is the Legal Director at Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 10:59 am
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Judge John D. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court's June 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm
Entities (i) with greater than 20 employees, (ii) that file Federal income tax returns demonstrating gross receipts or sales exceeding $5,000,000, and (iii) having a physical office in the United States are also exempt from the Proposed Rule. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
In response to an inquiry about wellness program that gave non-smoking employees substantial reductions on the health insurance premiums, the E.E.O.C. stated, "It could be argued that providing a monetary incentive to successfully participate renders the program involuntary because the size of the payment must be considered. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
And the bulk of any recovery in this case will go the United States treasury, for the benefit of all taxpayers. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
§ 2679, requires the United States to be substituted as defendant in place of a government employee facing a common-law tort suit, if the Attorney General certifies that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997.… [read post]
