Search for: "United States v. US Foreign Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
The plaintiffs agreed that NTT meets two conditions under 28 USC §1603(b) as a separate legal corporation that is not a citizen of the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm
When a company or an employee leads the company’s operations from within the United States and pockets profits from human rights abuses suffered abroad, the courts in the United States must exercise jurisdiction to hold them accountable. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:15 pm
In Morrison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
But the unique power that corporations wield can be used both for good and for bad. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Embezzlement by any person or persons hired, salaried or employed, to the detriment of their employers or principals, when the crime or offense is punishable by imprisonment or other corporal punishment by the laws of both countries, and where the amount embezzled exceeds 200 dollars in the United States of America or B. 1.000 in the United States of Venezuela. 16. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on March 10, 1932. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
" In his patent digest, Robert Matthews concludes that: Generally, a validity determination by a foreign patent office has little relevance or weight in considering the validity of a corresponding United States patent. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Kennedy states that the passage of the TVPA ushered in a period of more frequent and complex ATS suits involving “large groups of foreign plaintiffs suing foreign corporations in the United States for alleged human-rights violations in other nations. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm
§1605 (a)(2) reads: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case … in which the action is based [1] upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or [2] upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
Or as Justice Story puts it: “No nation has ever yet pretended to be the custos morum of the whole world…” (United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), specifically created by Congress to monitor and regulate foreign investments that may raise national security concerns, ordered Ralls to sell off the four companies, destroy what it had constructed, and stay off the land. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm
However, it would not be much of a stretch to see some possible implication for that case in remarks that Stevens did make about the importance of allowing state governments to restrict the political influence of foreign corporations, as non-voters in a state. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Hawaii, which upheld Donald Trump's anti-Muslim travel ban, and Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 7:31 am
In this case, the plaintiffs alleged only general corporate decision making occurred in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:03 pm
” The Court’s decision this week means that the question will be subject to litigation anew—but in all likelihood, venue for patent suits against foreign corporations will continue to lie anywhere in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:00 am
In Lang Van, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm
Author: Jarod Bona In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:15 am
A foreign defendant's "[m]ere corporate presence" in the United States, however, does not suffice. [read post]
