Search for: "United States v. US Foreign Corporation"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:40 pm
For example, just as in the case of a tribe, land used or beneficially owned by a tribal corporation may actually be owned by the United States in trust for the tribe and therefore cannot be subject to sale or alienation in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
See, e.g., Bryan v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 25, 1935. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:34 am
As a result, foreign witnesses can be compelled to travel to the United States and give in-person deposition testimony at the behest of any litigant in a trademark dispute, "for use in any contested case in the Patent and Trademark Office" ("PTO") â€â [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
The Lanham Act also allows a court to exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company when the company uses an agent within the United States to conduct “substantial business” with customers inside the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Åslund argues that “the Kremlin has exploited the US judicial system to advance the Russian state’s corrupt corporate raiding and expropriation schemes. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:37 am
District Court for the Central District of California issued on April 20 a written opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on May 19, 1937. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:01 pm
Author: Jarod Bona In an antitrust case deciding a non-antitrust-specific issue, the US Supreme Court held in Animal Science Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 2:46 pm
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
SCOTUSblog's own Lyle Denniston points out questions left unanswered by today's opinion: can foreign corporations with U.S. operations advertise for political candidates? [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Nevertheless, the argument turned back toward broader policy issues, as Justice Kennedy posed a hypothetical to illustrate what he perceived to be the United States’ position: Suppose an American corporation commits human trafficking with U.S. citizens in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Nevertheless, the argument turned back toward broader policy issues, as Justice Kennedy posed a hypothetical to illustrate what he perceived to be the United States’ position: Suppose an American corporation commits human trafficking with U.S. citizens in the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
S. 108, 114, 123-124 (2013): “principal objective of the statute, when first enacted, was to avoid foreign entanglements by ensuring the availability of a federal forum where the failure to provide one might cause another nation to hold the United States responsible for an injury to a foreign citizen. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
The treaty was ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1934. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:44 pm
To what extent should a foreign issuer be liable in US courts in connection with securities transactions effected outside the United States? [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
Section 1603(e) defined the language used in exception (1) as “commercial activity carried on by such state and having substantial contact with the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
Section 1603(e) defined the language used in exception (1) as “commercial activity carried on by such state and having substantial contact with the United States. [read post]
