Search for: "United States v. Under Seal"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:53 am
In a recent prebid protest presented by our firm, Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan, the United States Court of Federal Claims considered the protest of Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:37 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:48 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
Given that Congress created the FCA’s qui tam right to bring suit in the name of the United States, Congress certainly could add conditions to safeguard the interests of the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Pierce United States District Court for C.D. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:26 am
. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a showing of good cause was sufficient to support parties' requests to file documents under seal. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
One might justify what the Court did in Marschalk as stemming from the same pressures that led to the quick and decisive resolution of the Iranian claims isssue that prompted Dames & Moore itself, but in the typical case, a "GVR" in light of the new decision seems right on.Same, too, with the most recent well-known effort by a court of appeals to have the Supreme Court answer a certified question -- the en banc Second Circuit's 2005 certificate in… [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:41 am
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (Health Care Costs - Veterans) United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:54 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC, 2010 WL 5140729 (M.D. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In his Navy Seals concurrence, Justice Kavanaugh described deference to the military as a “bedrock constitutional principle” that implements the fact that “under Article II of the Constitution, the President of the United States, not any federal judge, is the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Lugosch v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 7:54 pm
United States Filter Corp. - see ILB upcoming oral argument notice here. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:33 pm
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 3:20 pm
Nov. 19, 2007).United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 7:46 am
In US v. [read post]
