Search for: "United States v. Valley" Results 1 - 20 of 1,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 6:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Arkansas Valley Adventures, January 6, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 5:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials in Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:48 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, the Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes, et al contend that the United States Department of Energy (DOE, & Secy. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
“For more than 20 years, the Tribe and the United States have raised concerns about the overdraft of the Valley’s aquifer and degradation of the drinking water. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 9:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But we cannot also conclude that the Termination Act implicitly gave the Uintah Valley Shoshone Tribe authority to exercise Ute tribal rights with respect to hunting and fishing, when the Act plainly established those rights within the Ute Tribe. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:45 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:07 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Valley View, Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:48 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 8:19 am by Anupam Chander
Former Vice Presidentof the United States Compensation Committee Nominating Committee Robert A. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Appellant Brief US Brief Appellant Response Brief Lower court materials here. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:04 am
On February 18, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed dismissal of a complaint filed by a ski rental store against the Deer Valley, Utah ski resort operator with its own ski rental operation alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]