Search for: "United States v. Vargas"
Results 1 - 20
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2007, 7:13 am
The Third Circuit has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 3:01 am
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case involving an immigrant that the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in on March 28. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:09 pm
See Vargas v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:00 pm
United States) in which a noncitizen faces mandatory removal based on a drug plea bargain. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
" United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:06 am
Vargas and her sons secretly left Croatia for the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2005, 12:10 pm
In Fernandez-Vargas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:41 pm
Twitter brings news of this interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 10:47 am
The court cited the Supreme court’s opinion in Rodriguez v United States which states as a general matter a traffic stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made is a violation of the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 10:47 am
The court cited the Supreme court’s opinion in Rodriguez v United States which states as a general matter a traffic stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the stop was made is a violation of the Constitution’s shield against unreasonable seizures. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:01 am
The recently issued opinion of the United States Tax Court in Martignon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 4:24 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:35 pm
This was made clear last July 24, 2023, when the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decided United States v. [read post]
