Search for: "United States v. Various Parcels of Real Property"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Geopolitical tensions and strategic competition between the United States and China have increasingly influenced the investment landscape in recent years, implicating established regulatory frameworks such as that of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), as well as driving non-traditional government actors to take action. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
Project Background and Litigation History The Specific Plan covered 13 parcels comprising 797 acres, with a proposed development including up to 4,340 dwelling units with a maximum population increase of 15,928 new residents, as well as other uses including mixed use commercial, parks, open space, and schools. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
TJM also owned certain real property near downtown Dallas, Texas. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
THIS ARTICLE DISCUSSES THE IMPACT OF THAT REVISION as well as considerations for developers contemplating the purchase or development of real property that contains or is likely to contain regulated wetlands. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
In Congress and in statehouses throughout the United States, lawmakers continue to introduce legislation designed to bar citizens of foreign adversaries from being able to purchase real property. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
Save North Petaluma River and Wetlands v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
The example is lightly modified from the facts in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In 1974, the County adopted a rezoning measure that reduced how many residences Martha could build on its property. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
In 2010, the real parties applied for a design permit, planned development permit (PDP), tentative map, general plan amendment, and rezoning to build 40 residential units on the parcel. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
The Project and Its Background Real Party Sierra Pacific Industries (SPI) owns two large parcels of land in Martis Valley (unincorporated Placer County) between Truckee and Lake Tahoe; a 1,052-acre parcel on the west side (West Parcel), and a 6,376-acre parcel on the east side (East Parcel) of state route (SR) 267. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
In Section 2202, the PRA provides that the United States owns “Presidential records. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs sued the State Water Resources Control Board (the “Board”), alleging that the board violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) by granting a small domestic use registration to real parties-in-interest without first conducting an environmental review. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
United States (9th Cir. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
United States (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
The facts involve a relatively small project on 8.2 acres, and the developer’s plan was to consolidate 24 parcels into two lots, with a mixed-use project on 6.23 acres and the balance of 1.98 acres as an open space lot. [read post]
