Search for: "United States v. Veatch" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" Here, the Court essentially found that the false certification regarding minor breaches of the contract was not material to the government's decision to continue paying on the contract because the government continued to pay defendant on the contract long after the government knew of and defendant self-reported the violations.Defendant Black and Veatch was a large construction firm that contracted with the United States Agency for International Development… [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" Here, the Court essentially found that the false certification regarding minor breaches of the contract was not material to the government's decision to continue paying on the contract because the government continued to pay defendant on the contract long after the government knew of and defendant self-reported the violations.Defendant Black and Veatch was a large construction firm that contracted with the United States Agency for International Development… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:11 am
In the recent case of Teal Assurance Company Ltd v (1) WR Berkley Insurance (Europe) Ltd (2) Aspen Insurance UK Ltd (2011) EWHC 91 (Comm), the Commercial Court considered the order in which losses eroded liability in a complex professional indemnity tower.Teal, the captive insurer of engineering company Black & Veatch (BV), issued a number of policies covering the professional indemnity liabilities and costs of mitigating losses of BV (the Underlying Policies). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:26 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
  In April 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri denied the reinsurers’ motion. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
Supreme Court regarding lethal injection, Baze v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
If it says “freedom of speech,” that phrase has to be interpreted to make sense to the current citizens of the United States. [read post]