Search for: "United States v. Vidal"
Results 1 - 20
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm
Vidal Font has procured trademark applications and represented clients before the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the Puerto Rico Trademark Office, and has litigated intellectual property matters both at the state and federal levels. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:15 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal has intervened in two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cases that have caused much controversy in the patent world. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:47 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 10 page opinion, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Puerto Rico Juan Perez-Gimenez denied the joint motion for summary judgment in Conde-Vidal v.... [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:15 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal on April 19 vacated a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that had denied institution of an inter partes review (IPR) for a lighting system patent owned by Rotolight Limited. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:15 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal on April 19 vacated a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that had denied institution of an inter partes review (IPR) for a lighting system patent owned by Rotolight Limited. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:15 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal has intervened in two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cases that have caused much controversy in the patent world. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:15 am
Following a late April request by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) to then newly-confirmed United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal asking her to respond to a number of questions surrounding abuse of the inter partes review (IPR) system, Vidal last week sent a letter explaining she is working on the problem. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:15 pm
On April 27, Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) and Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), both members of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, wrote to Kathi Vidal, the newly confirmed Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), to inquire as to why the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is allowing itself to become weaponized. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 9:23 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) stayed active over the holiday period with several big announcements, and today Director Kathi Vidal continued that trend by designating as precedential the December 21 decision in Apple v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 9:23 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) stayed active over the holiday period with several big announcements, and today Director Kathi Vidal continued that trend by designating as precedential the December 21 decision in Apple v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In a new memo published Tuesday in the Federal Register, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) also says “no. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 1:11 pm
Trump, United States District Judge Nicholas Garaufis granted a preliminary injunction... [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
In Matas-Vidal v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:50 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Conde-Vidal v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
When Vidal arrived in the United States to work for defendant as a nurse, he signed an arbitration agreement, which contains a "loser pays" provision that says the prevailing party in the arbitration is entitled to arbitral costs and attorneys' fees. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:32 am
In the recent case of JM Vidal, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:15 am
The issue of AI inventorship in the United States remains at large following the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Thaler v. [read post]
