Search for: "United States v. Vigil"
Results 221 - 240
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Siegel, 1986 Supp Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3101:9, at 4; Rep No. 95 of Comm on State Legis, Bill Jacket, L 1985, ch 294 at 16). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
We have to be very smart and very vigilant”. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 pm
Jones, 61 M.J. 80 (C.A.A.F. 2005); United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled that it was likely to allow mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions, to remain widely available in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm
Early in the pandemic, António Guterres the 9th Secretary-General of the United Nations, stated, Early signs are that the COVID-19 virus poses a greater direct health risk to men, and particularly older men. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:48 am
In Chicago v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
United States applies. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm
The claimants (and Liberty) argued that this should be considered as a ‘modality’ case, as per Bah v United Kingdom (2012) 54 EHRR 21. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 9:38 am
Cloud, a Pennsylvania case in which the RIAA's outlandish statutory damages theory is being contested by a sole practitioner battling several of the RIAA's law firms, the United States Department of Justice has filed papers indicating that it is considering intervening in the case on the side of the RIAA: United States Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Determine if Intervention is AppropriateI urge all of my readers to:1. write to Pres. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
These difficulties are amplified exponentially when the client is the President of the United States, and he continuously sabotages his lawyers, who are struggling to defend his policies in an already-hostile arena. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
The need for vigilance is even more important following last week's decision of the United States Supreme Court , holding that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act includes "third-party reprisal" claims. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 1:35 pm
United States, 593 U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
