Search for: "United States v. Villar"
Results 61 - 80
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
United States Docket: 09-5801 Issue: Whether the Court’s decision in Nguyen v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
And tomorrow the Court will hear oral argument in Flores-Villar v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
United States: One of the two cases affirmed by an equally divided court, the decision illustrates the minimal impact Justice Elena Kagan's recusals had on the term.Honorable Mentions: Snyder v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:13 pm
Citing a United States Supreme Court case, Skinner v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
-citizen mothers outside of the United States, and those born to unmarried U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
Without U.S. citizenship, Flores-Villar was deported for committing a crime and charged with being present in the United States illegally when he tried to return. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am
United States (full disclosure — I was on the Chaidez team), the court found Padilla non-retroactive. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:17 am
Services Ltd., 172 F.3d 132, 144 (2d Cir.1999); Villareal v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
United States, which was argued in November. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:23 am
United States, a gender discrimination case argued two weeks ago. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
United States, 09-5801. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
United States. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:08 am
EMA; Flores-Villar v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:13 pm
Citing a United States Supreme Court case, Skinner v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Ed. 2d542 (2000) (citing Martinez-Villareal, supra); seealso Felker v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
It also had to ignore its own prior holding, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
United States, and Smith v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:33 pm
Supreme Court, November 09, 2009 Bobby v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:29 am
United States, which will be argued this morning. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
INS (2001), and United States v. [read post]
