Search for: "United States v. Vinson"
Results 121 - 140
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
Francis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:24 am
Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), the United States Supreme Court, in the context of a sexual harassment claim under Title VII, broadly interpreted the phrase “terms, conditions or privileges of employment” to include protection from a hostile work environment. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
United States (2001) (dissenting). [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
After saying that Congress has taxing power, the provision does say — without elaboration – that Congress also has the power “to provide for….the general welfare of the United States.” Congress customarily does not just hand out money to the states without strings attached. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:19 pm
The Supreme Court summed up how the severability doctrine is to work in a 1992 decision, New York v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
“The fact there have been 17 permits approved shows states are really figuring out how to do this,” Margaret Peloso, an attorney at Vinson & Elkins LLP who works on permits for industry clients, told BNA.Permits Target EfficienciesPSD requires new and modified sources to obtain permits for emissions of regulated air pollutants and to control those emissions using best available control technology (BACT), determined individually for each sourcePermitting includes a… [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York to 11 years in prison—the lengthiest term ever imposed on an individual for insider trading violations (United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:44 pm
The court, in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
United States, Justice Anthony Kennedy – a key swing voter – emphasized that constitutional constraints on federal power protect “the liberty of the individual” as well as “state sovereignty. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
State of play When all this began in March 2010 – the same day President Obama signed the legislation, both Virginia and the Florida-led multi-state coalition filed complaints in federal court – mainstream pundits dismissed the challenges as legally frivolous, politically motivated sour grapes. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:48 am
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:52 am
NEW YORK—The May 11 guilty verdict in the insider-trading trial of former Galleon Management LLC principal Raj Rajaratnam may embolden federal prosecutors to use increasingly aggressive tactics during insider trading cases, former prosecutors told BNA May 11 (United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
District Judge Roger Vinson's Jan. 31 decision. [read post]
