Search for: "United States v. Vinson"
Results 141 - 160
of 191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
That strategy helped secure the unanimous 1991 Supreme Court ruling in UAW v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:37 am
” Vinson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
” [Disclaimer: Lawyers at Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this feature, represent one industry respondent in these cases.] [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Sao Paulo location is the second overseas office for 700-lawyer Proskauer, which has seven offices in the United States and one in Paris. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:36 pm
And prior to this year, the court’s last signed decision in July was United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:23 am
The first is Frothingham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Bremerton School District, 18-12 Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in this case. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm
United States. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
United States.) [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
.
Vinson & Elkins Dismissed From Enron Shareholders' Suit
Texas Lawyer
Houston's Vinson & Elkins, longtime outside counsel for Enron Corp., has been dismissed from a massive shareholder securities class action. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am
The closures are distributed across eight different states. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
The United States has repeatedly reaffirmed that the archipelago falls within its mutual defense treaty with Japan. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
The United States has repeatedly reaffirmed that the archipelago falls within its mutual defense treaty with Japan. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”) eliminated the writ of habeas corpus for any “alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 16-309). [read post]
