Search for: "United States v. Ware" Results 161 - 180 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 10:45 pm by Bruno Tarabichi
  However, on February 23, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Fleischer Studios did not own the copyright to the Betty Boop character. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:23 am by Antitrust Today
  Judge Ware in July certified a class of “All persons who purchased or acquired an iPhone in the United States and entered into a two-year agreement with Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC for iPhone voice and data service anytime from June 29, 2007 to the present. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Now we need new hands to help carry the message of how valuable Bayh-Dole is to the continued health and wealth of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:06 am by The Legal Blog
Earlier, the Supreme Court referred to Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gregory Forman
Eventually, I may need to petition the United States Supreme Court for certiorari in the case of Ware v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:56 am by Durga Rao
In the only United Kingdom case in which this section has been successfully invoked, Mayer v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm by Gregory Forman
The issue on appeal is the application of the “full faith and credit” clause of the United States Constitution,[1] as interpreted by Durfee v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:02 am by Susan Brenner
[T]he Government . . . expects to prove at trial that there are high-frequency trading systems that may be purchased by securities trading firms, and that Goldman maintains computers in the United States and elsewhere in the world that use its Trading System to conduct trading on world markets. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:35 am by Phillip V. Marano
., and Tiffany & Co. filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari appealing the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:22 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Further, the ITC “determined to issue cease and orders against those respondents found by the ALJ to maintain a commercially significant inventory of infringing products in the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  That means, of course, to anyone who follows this blog with any regularity at all, that the plaintiffs’ personal injury claims ware subject to express preemption under Riegel v. [read post]