Search for: "United States v. Wearing" Results 21 - 40 of 1,909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2013, 10:19 am by Workplace Prof
At issue in United States ex rel Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Our second largest state seceded from Mexico (and then, of course, with ten other states, attempted to secede from the United States in a struggle that ultimately cost 750,000 lives (for starters). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The Northern Ireland Prison Service Standing Orders stated that prisoners were not permitted to wear emblems outside their cells or display emblems in their cells. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:12 pm
[They] involve public employees wearing small crosses as the prosecutor did in this case, they were civil cases brought by the employees to vindicate their rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:32 am by Mark Sorkin
Wilson, citing at length their contention that the record-high level of incarceration in the United States has been beneficial. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 11:08 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by Howard Friedman
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Index Newspapers v City of Portland, 3:20-cv-1035-SI, the United States District Court for the District of Oregon has entered a temporary restraining order that blocks federal law enforcement officers from arresting or using physical force against journalists and legal observers as they respond to anti–police brutality protests there. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1970), a case dealing with actors who were prosecuted for wearing a military uniform as part of political street theater; and the court has long protected speech engaged in for entertainment purposes as much as speech engaged in for overtly political purposes (e.g., Winters v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:55 am
If you want to read about a large number of issues in federal criminal law in one place, you should check out United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:02 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
As this case demonstrates, the novelty of an assimilative charging decision under Article 134 often wears off during the course of an appeal, Says ACCA in a footnote to United States v. [read post]