Search for: "United States v. West Penn Power Co." Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Duphily, 703 A.2d 1202, 1209 (Del. 1997); Alabama Power Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Issue: Whether a state court may determine whether the bulk power supply arrangements of an interstate power pool governed by a FERC tariff violate state tort law. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Like the organization of political power, which is understood to be necessarily centered on the state as the sole embodiment of collective power, the organization of economic power is understood to be centered on the state apparatus as the sole embodiment of economic power. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
Part V: The Separation of Powers Every casebook included Morrison v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The agreement also is significant because it documents EPA’s recognition and approval of West Virginia’s program and the DEP’s capabilities and authorities for addressing cleanups under the state program. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
West Penn Power Co., 147 F.3d 256, 263 & n.13 (3d Cir. 1998) (“[w]e do draw on the allegations of the complaint, but in a realistic, rather than a slavish, manner”; rejecting “unsupported conclusions and unwarranted inferences”); Columbia Natural Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]