Search for: "United States v. Wiley" Results 121 - 140 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Here is Kim’s guest post:    This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
That means that §602(a)(1) allows the importation into the United States of a copy of a protected work purchased abroad. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:34 pm by Gregory Winsky
LG Electronics; and that the sale outside of the United States of an article covered by a US patent does not exhaust the rights of the patent holder as against the purchaser of that article on the purchaser’s importation of that article into the United States, notwithstanding the 2013 copyright decision of the Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm by admin
  Nevertheless, it was persuaded by a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Quality King Distributors, v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
., to Turkey, and the enforcement of court-ordered visitation so long as the children remained in the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
John Wiley & Son – a case  involving gray market goods and copyright items;  Clapper v. [read post]