Search for: "United States v. William Kennedy"
Results 121 - 140
of 555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” As Chief Justice Marshall put it (quoting Justice Ginsburg in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
Evans and continuing through his recent opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito Jr. and Chief Justice John Roberts peppered the plaintiffs’ attorney with questions focused on, as Justice Alito asked, “What business does [this] case have in the courts of the United States?” [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito Jr. and Chief Justice John Roberts peppered the plaintiffs’ attorney with questions focused on, as Justice Alito asked, “What business does [this] case have in the courts of the United States? [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Because the United States government prosecuted Mr. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
., Professor of Law at William & Mary Law School. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
Pinholster v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
United States,] the infamous 1944 Supreme Court decision blessing internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:16 am
State, 385 S.W.3d 110, the United States Supreme Court has rejected any position that would treat Transportation Code §724.012(b)(3)(B) as an exception to the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
FEC Overbreadth Doctrine: United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
The first case is United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
The question, then, is how the United States will get there and more specifically, what should be the role of the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
United States). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
By Joseph Fishkin & William E. [read post]
