Search for: "United States v. Williams-Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Unlimited liability was never the norm for bank shareholders or executives in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am by John Coyle
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Scalia, J., thought Presidents were "officers of the United States" (Lawfare). [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
More than a dozen years ago, Peter Mahler wrote about one such case, Barasch v Williams Real Estate Co. (33 Misc 3d 1219[A] [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In the long litany of head-scratching moments emerging from our growing knowledge about the highest-ranking Republican in the United States government, I was both confused and amused when I saw this in The Guardian. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
” In 2021 we published an article concluding “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]