Search for: "United States v. Willis, Jr." Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
  “Although the United States agrees with [Davis] that the question presented is an important and recurring one on which there is a conflict among the courts of appeals and state supreme courts, this case is not a good vehicle to resolve that question,” the Department argued. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Justice Viviano’s concurring and dissenting opinion explicitly calls for “adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States” (p 29 of his opinion). [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:43 am by Steve Hall
Instead, trial courts say that the United States Supreme Court has said that the death penalty is not unconstitutional as being cruel or unusual. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am by Aaron Moss
A new crop of copyrighted works (including rights in a certain famous British detective) will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2023. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is the legacy of the brilliant Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
McReynolds and Willis Van Devanter aligned closely with the new chief’s social and political views. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Edward A. Fallone
As the debate over the correct recall procedures continues, it is possible that the Friends of the Scott Walker might downplay its statutory arguments and place more weight on its unprecedented argument that the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires the GAB to account for the so-called “rights” of non-voters. [read post]