Search for: "United States v. Wolff" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 8:18 am by Harry Styron
The court’s majority opinion pointed out crucial facts that kept the court from applying the due process rules which were set out by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, most recently in Jones v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:08 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeJudges Lack Freedom to Consider Deportation As Additional Punishment That Reduces Sentence United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Jackson Women’s Health entrenches the historical failures of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Qualifications for employment in the public service mandated by statute may not be waivedMartin, as Administratrix of The Estate of Christos Lekkas v State of New York et al., 82 AD2d 712Christos Lekkas, a permanent Assistant Clinical Physician in the then Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,* [OMRDD] was never licensed to practice medicine in New York or in any State of the United States or in the Dominion of Canada. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Qualifications for employment in the public service mandated by statute may not be waivedMartin, as Administratrix of The Estate of Christos Lekkas v State of New York et al., 82 AD2d 712Christos Lekkas, a permanent Assistant Clinical Physician in the then Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities,* [OMRDD] was never licensed to practice medicine in New York or in any State of the United States or in the Dominion of Canada. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 3:59 am
For the reasons that follow, we hold that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining that the children were habitual residents of the United States at the time of the alleged abduction. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 10(a).Although the courts have recognized certain common law exceptions for vacating an arbitration award, See Footnote 3 the United States Supreme Court recently held that the grounds listed in the statute are the exclusive grounds for vacating an arbitration award under the FAA. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:48 am by Shea Denning
The Edwards Court further reasoned that the fact that the hearing officer was a DMV employee did not invalidate the process, citing the United States Supreme Court’s determination in Wolff v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Austria, 13470/87, 20 September 1994; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 17419/90, 25 November 1996; İ.A. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has delivered an opinion that highlights several important procedural issues having to do with LLCs and derivative suits. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Far-right activists in the United States are planning a copycat convoy of truckers from California to Washington D.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Plain Dealer, 632 N.E.2d 1282, 1284 (Ohio 1994) ("The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:48 am by SHG
In the intervening years, the Supreme Court has issued some good opinions, such as United States v. [read post]