Search for: "United States v. Wp, Jr." Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck has been assisting with research and strategic planning in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:34 am by Jack Goldsmith
Chris Cillizza has a piece in the WP that argues that the world is too splintered and partisan and complex, and communication and persuasion too difficult, for the president of the United States to succeed. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
The new Sec. 1041 provides that the Defense Secretary “may not use any of the amounts authorized” in the new law  ”"or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to release into the United States, its territories, or possessions, any individual…who is not a citizen of the United States, and is in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense, or otherwise under… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
Will has an article in the upcoming issue of Newsweek, Cruelty in the Court, discussing the issues at stake in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Roberts, Jr., and Justice Samuel A. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Alito, Jr., somewhat less so, although he, too, was highly skeptical of continuing to apply the law to a local governmental unit that “had done nothing wrong. [read post]